ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2023
Physics-Guided Deep Scatter Estimation by Weak Supervision for Quantitative SPECT.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accurate CT-free correction of attenuation, scatter, and aperture effects using deep learning in dedicated cardiac pinhole SPECT.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based attenuation and scatter correction in myocardial SPECT without using X-ray CT images.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Impact of dual-energy window scatter correction on technetium image quality across different energy windows in cadmium-zinc-telluride-based SPECT/CT.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Scatter correction for self-collimating SPECT using a 3D U-Net framework.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Enhanced direct joint attenuation and scatter correction of whole-body PET images via context-aware deep networks.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2025Article
- AI in SPECT Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate scatter estimation is important in quantitative SPECT for improving image contrast and accuracy. With a large number of photon histories, Monte-Carlo (MC) simulation can yield accurate scatter estimation, but is computationally expensive. Recent deep learning-based approaches can yield accurate scatter estimates quickly, yet full MC simulation is still required to generate scatter estimates as ground truth labels for all training data. Here we propose a physics-guided weakly supervised training framework for fast and accurate scatter estimation in quantitative SPECT by using a 100× shorter MC simulation as weak labels and enhancing them with deep neural networks. Our weakly supervised approach also allows quick fine-tuning of the trained network to any new test data for further improved performance with an additional short MC simulation (weak label) for patient-specific scatter modelling. Our method was trained with 18 XCAT phantoms with diverse anatomies / activities and then was evaluated on 6 XCAT phantoms, 4 realistic virtual patient phantoms, 1 torso phantom and 3 clinical scans from 2 patients for 177Lu SPECT with single / dual photopeaks (113, 208 keV). Our proposed weakly supervised method yielded comparable performance to the supervised counterpart in phantom experiments, but with significantly reduced computation in labeling. Our proposed method with patient-specific fine-tuning achieved more accurate scatter estimates than the supervised method in clinical scans. Our method with physics-guided weak supervision enables accurate deep scatter estimation in quantitative SPECT, while requiring much lower computation in labeling, enabling patient-specific fine-tuning capability in testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.