Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37104058›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2023

Impact of type of induction therapy on outcomes in older adults with AML after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Nicholas J Short, Faustine Ong, Farhad Ravandi, Graciela Nogueras-Gonzalez, Tapan M Kadia, Naval Daver, Courtney D DiNardo, Marina Konopleva, Gautam Borthakur, Betul Oran and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Tailoring Therapy in Older Adults With Hematologic Malignancies.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas J ShortDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-2983-2738
Faustine OngDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-4442-2646
Farhad RavandiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Graciela Nogueras-GonzalezDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-6350-2206
Tapan M KadiaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Naval DaverDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-7103-373X
Courtney D DiNardoDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-9003-0390
Marina KonoplevaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Gautam BorthakurDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Betul OranDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Gheath Al-AtrashDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Rohtesh MehtaDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-8532-544X
Elias J JabbourDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Musa YilmazDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Ghayas C IssaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-4339-8683
Abhishek MaitiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Richard E ChamplinDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-4314-5037
Hagop KantarjianDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Elizabeth J ShpallDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Uday PopatDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-7592-2224
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although venetoclax-based lower-intensity regimens have greatly improved outcomes for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy, the optimal induction for older patients with newly diagnosed AML who are suitable candidates for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is controversial. We retrospectively analyzed the post HSCT outcomes of 127 patients ≥60 years of age who received induction therapy at our institution with intensive chemotherapy (IC; n = 44), lower-intensity therapy (LIT) without venetoclax (n = 29), or LIT with venetoclax (n = 54) and who underwent allogeneic HSCT in the first remission. The 2-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 60% with LIT with venetoclax vs 54% with IC, and 41% with LIT without venetoclax; the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 72% LIT with venetoclax vs 58% with IC, and 41% with LIT without venetoclax. The benefit of LIT with venetoclax induction was greatest in patients with adverse-risk AML (2-year OS: 74%, 46%, and 29%, respectively). Induction with LIT, with or without venetoclax, was associated with the lowest rate of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (2-year NRM: 17% vs 27% with IC; P = .04). Using multivariate analysis, the type of induction therapy did not significantly affect any of the post HSCT outcomes evaluated; hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index was the only factor that independently predicted RFS and OS. LIT plus venetoclax followed by HSCT is a feasible treatment strategy in older, fit, HSCT-eligible patients with newly diagnosed AML and may be particularly beneficial for those with adverse-risk disease.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAgedBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicHumansInduction ChemotherapyRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSulfonamidesTransplantation, HomologousTreatment OutcomeBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicSulfonamidesvenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID37104058
PMCPMC10368841
OpenAlexW4367174243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.