ArticleBlood advances2023
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in sickle cell disease: a multicenter cohort study of adolescent inpatients.
Article in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute Chest Syndrome in Children with Sickle Cell Disease: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Emergency care for children with sickle cell disease: a focus on pain and fever.Expert review of hematology · 2025Review
- Blood cell traits and venous thromboembolism in East Asians: Observational and genetic evidence.iScience · 2024Article
- Mouse models of sickle cell disease: Imperfect and yet very informative.Blood cells, molecules & diseases · 2024Review
- Therapeutics for sickle cell disease intravascular hemolysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
- Predisposing Factors and Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism among Hospitalized Patients with Sickle Cell Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are predisposed to a hypercoagulable state. Despite the increased risk of venous thromboembolism in the SCD population, there is limited evidence available to guide thromboprophylaxis (TP) practices in these patients. This study aimed to assess the use of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic TP in adolescent patients with SCD using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS). We hypothesized that TP was increasingly used in hospitalized adolescent patients with SCD. The study included patients with SCD aged 13 to 21 years, admitted to a PHIS hospital between 1 January, 2010, and 30 June, 2021. A total of 7202 unique patients consisting of 34 094 unique admissions were included for analyses. Pharmacologic or mechanical TP was used in 2600 (7.6%) admissions, with 3.6% of admissions (n = 1225) receiving pharmacologic prophylaxis and 4.3% (n = 1474) receiving mechanical prophylaxis. Pharmacologic TP increased in use from 1.3% of admissions in 2010 to 14.4% in the first half of 2021. Enoxaparin was the most commonly prescribed anticoagulant, used in 87% of admissions in which pharmacologic TP was used. The use of prophylactic direct oral anticoagulants was first documented in 2018 and increased to 25% of admissions with pharmacologic TP by 2021. This study demonstrates a steady increase in TP use in adolescent patients with SCD admitted to the hospital. Prospective cohort studies are needed to determine VTE risk factors in adolescents and children with SCD and the efficacy and safety of prophylactic regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.