ReviewMembranes2023
Forward Osmosis Membrane: Review of Fabrication, Modification, Challenges and Potential.
Review in Membranes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transport Coherence Loss in Heterogeneous Forward Osmosis Membranes: A Hierarchical Diagnostic Framework.Membranes · 2026Article
- Performance evaluation of cellulose triacetate and cellulose diacetate hybrid membranes with carbon nanotube (CNT) for sustainable slaughterhouse wastewater treatment via forward osmosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Modeling and Performance Analysis of a Hybrid Forward Osmosis-Membrane Distillation System for Seawater Desalination.Membranes · 2026Article
- Article
- Forward Osmosis for Produced Water Treatment: Comparative Performance Evaluation of Fabricated and Commercial Membranes.Polymers · 2026Article
- The Advent of MXene-Based Synthetics and Modification Approaches for Advanced Applications in Wastewater Treatment.Membranes · 2025Review
- Novel Dual-Layer Zwitterionic Modification of Electrospun Nanofibrous Membrane for Produced Water Treatment and Reclamation.Membranes · 2025Article
- Overcoming the Limitations of Forward Osmosis and Membrane Distillation in Sustainable Hybrid Processes Managing the Water-Energy Nexus.Membranes · 2025Review
- Superior forward osmosis cellulosic membrane for water desalination and brine concentration.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Metal-phenolic network as precursor complex coating for forward osmosis membrane with enhanced antifouling property.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2024Article
- Microwave Synthesis of Poly(Acrylic) Acid-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles as Draw Solutes in Forward Osmosis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forward osmosis (FO) is a low-energy treatment process driven by osmosis to induce the separation of water from dissolved solutes/foulants through the membrane in hydraulic pressure absence while retaining all of these materials on the other side. All these advantages make it an alternative process to reduce the disadvantages of traditional desalination processes. However, several critical fundamentals still require more attention for understanding them, most notably the synthesis of novel membranes that offer a support layer with high flux and an active layer with high water permeability and solute rejection from both solutions at the same time, and a novel draw solution which provides low solute flux, high water flux, and easy regeneration. This work reviews the fundamentals controlling the FO process performance such as the role of the active layer and substrate and advances in the modification of FO membranes utilizing nanomaterials. Then, other aspects that affect the performance of FO are further summarized, including types of draw solutions and the role of operating conditions. Finally, challenges associated with the FO process, such as concentration polarization (CP), membrane fouling, and reverse solute diffusion (RSD) were analyzed by defining their causes and how to mitigate them. Moreover, factors affecting the energy consumption of the FO system were discussed and compared with reverse osmosis (RO). This review will provide in-depth details about FO technology, the issues it faces, and potential solutions to those issues to help the scientific researcher facilitate a full understanding of FO technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.