Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37103802›Full record

ArticleMembranes2023

Understanding the Residence Time Distribution in a Transient Inline Spiking System: Modeling, Experiments, and Simulations.

Minsun Hwang, Junsuk Wang, Seon Yeop Jung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Minsun HwangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin-si 16890, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0005-1936-7923
Junsuk WangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin-si 16890, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Seon Yeop JungDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin-si 16890, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7266-1084

Funding

Dankook University 2021-00714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A transient inline spiking system is a promising tool for evaluating the performance of a virus filter in continuous operation. For better implementation of the system, we performed a systematic analysis to understand the residence time distribution (RTD) of inert tracers in the system. We aimed to understand the RTD of a salt spike, not retained onto or within the membrane pore, to focus on its mixing and spreading within the processing units. A concentrated NaCl solution was spiked into a feed stream as the spiking duration (tspike) was varied from 1 to 40 min. A static mixer was employed to mix the salt spike with the feed stream, which then passed through a single-layered nylon membrane inserted in a filter holder. The RTD curve was obtained by measuring the conductivity of the collected samples. An analytical model, the PFR-2CSTR model, was employed to predict the outlet concentration from the system. The slope and peak of the RTD curves were well-aligned with the experimental findings when τPFR = 4.3 min, τCSTR1 = 4.1 min, and τCSTR2 = 1.0 min. CFD simulations were performed to describe the flow and transport of the inert tracers through the static mixer and the membrane filter. The RTD curve spanned more than 30 min, much longer than tspike, since solutes were dispersed within processing units. The flow characteristics in each processing unit correlated with the RTD curves. Our detailed analysis of the transient inline spiking system would be helpful for implementing this protocol in continuous bioprocessing.

Indexed as

computational fluid dynamicscontinuous bioprocessinginline spikingtransport phenomenaviral clearance

Identifiers

PMID37103802
PMCPMC10143522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.