ArticleAmbio2023
Placing diverse knowledge systems at the core of transformative climate research.
Article in Ambio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Community-led landscape regeneration: A review of and framework for engagement in restoration initiatives.Ambio · 2026Pooled it
- Reviewing the science on 50 years of conservation: Knowledge production biases and lessons for practice.Ambio · 2024Pooled it
- How identity bias affects perceptions of conservation messages on social media.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
- Imagining an ethics for synthetic biology.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Political ecology: past, present, and future.Discover sustainability · 2026Review
- Indigenous critiques and recommendations for reclaiming nature-based solutions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Reflections on the future of European ethnobiology.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Using positionality and reflexivity to support equity in partnership-driven research.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Cities Are Concentrators of Complex, MultiSectoral Interactions Within the Human-Earth System.Earth's future · 2024Article
- Decolonizing climate agreements strengthens policy and research for all future generations.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We argue that solutions-based research must avoid treating climate change as a merely technical problem, recognizing instead that it is symptomatic of the history of European and North American colonialism. It must therefore be addressed by decolonizing the research process and transforming relations between scientific expertise and the knowledge systems of Indigenous Peoples and of local communities. Partnership across diverse knowledge systems can be a path to transformative change only if those systems are respected in their entirety, as indivisible cultural wholes of knowledge, practices, values, and worldviews. This argument grounds our specific recommendations for governance at the local, national, and international scales. As concrete mechanisms to guide collaboration across knowledge systems, we propose a set of instruments based on the principles of consent, intellectual and cultural autonomy, and justice. We recommend these instruments as tools to ensure that collaborations across knowledge systems embody just partnerships in support of a decolonial transformation of relations between human communities and between humanity and the more-than-human world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.