ArticleJournal of neurology2023
Comparison of spinal magnetic resonance imaging and classical clinical factors in predicting motor capacity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00002013 (A Safety, Pilot Pharmacokinetics and Neurocognitive Study of AS-101 in Combination With Zidovudine in AIDS/ARC Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Safety, Pilot Pharmacokinetics and Neurocognitive Study of AS-101 in Combination With Zidovudine in AIDS/ARC Patients
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Update on recent advances in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Potential of neuroimaging as a biomarker in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: from structure to metabolism.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Quantitative brainstem and spinal MRI in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: implications for predicting noninvasive ventilation needs.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- T1-weighted MRI texture analysis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients stratified by the D50 progression model.Brain communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMotor capacity is crucial in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinical trial design and patient care. However, few studies have explored the potential of multimodal MRI to predict motor capacity in ALS. This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of cervical spinal cord MRI parameters for motor capacity in ALS compared to clinical prognostic factors.
methodsSpinal multimodal MRI was performed shortly after diagnosis in 41 ALS patients and 12 healthy participants as part of a prospective multicenter cohort study, the PULSE study (NCT00002013-A00969-36). Motor capacity was assessed using ALSFRS-R scores. Multiple stepwise linear regression models were constructed to predict motor capacity at 3 and 6 months from diagnosis, based on clinical variables, structural MRI measurements, including spinal cord cross-sectional area (CSA), anterior-posterior, and left-to-right cross-section diameters at vertebral levels from C1 to T4, and diffusion parameters in the lateral corticospinal tracts (LCSTs) and dorsal columns.
resultsStructural MRI measurements were significantly correlated with the ALSFRS-R score and its sub-scores. And as early as 3 months from diagnosis, structural MRI measurements fit the best multiple linear regression model to predict the total ALSFRS-R (R
conclusionsSpinal multimodal MRI could be promising as a tool to enhance prognostic accuracy and serve as a motor function proxy in ALS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.