Patient-reported outcome measures after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty were better than medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy in early elderly patients with severe osteoarthritis.

backgroundMany countries are faced with aging populations. However, few studies have directly compared the clinical outcomes of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA) in early elderly patients. Thus, we aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes after OWHTO and MB-UKA in early elderly patients with similar demographics and osteoarthritis (OA) severity.

methodsThree hundred and fifteen OWHTO and 142 MB-UKA were performed for medial compartment OA by a single surgeon between August 2009 and April 2020. Among them, patients aged 65-74 years with more than two years of follow-up were enrolled. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including visual analog scale (VAS) score and Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM) score, were compared between both procedures preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The PROMs were compared between the groups by Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) OA grades.

resultsSeventy-three OWHTO and 37 MB-UKA patients were enrolled. No significant differences were found in the distribution of age, gender, follow-up period, body mass index, and Tegner activity scale between the two procedures. The postoperative PROMs in patients with K-L grade 4 were better after MB-UKA than OWHTO at the mean follow-up of 5 years. No significant difference was found in PROMs in patients with K-L grades 2 and 3.

conclusionThePROMs after MB-UKA were superior to that after OWHTO in early elderly patients with severe OA. In particular, pain relief was better after MB-UKA than OWHTO with severe OA. Meanwhile, no significant difference in PROMs was found with moderate OA patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IVprospective cohort study.