Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37103571›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

A qualitative analysis describing attrition from bariatric surgery to identify strategies for improving retention in patients who desire treatment.

Grace F Chao, Kerry Lindquist, Crystal A Vitous, Dante A Tolentino, Lia Delaney, Yewande Alimi, Sara M Jafri, Dana A Telem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Grace F ChaoNational Clinician Scholars Program at the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. grace.f.chao@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3133-9827
Kerry LindquistCenter for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Crystal A VitousCenter for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Dante A TolentinoSchool of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lia DelaneyCenter for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Yewande AlimiDepartment of Surgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Sara M JafriCenter for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Dana A TelemCenter for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong patients who express interest in bariatric surgery, dropout rates from bariatric surgery programs are reported as high as 60%. There is a lack of understanding how we can better support patients to obtain treatment of this serious chronic disease.

methodsSemi-structured interviews with individuals who dropped out of bariatric surgery programs from three clinical sites were conducted. Transcripts were iteratively analyzed to understand patterns clustering around codes. We mapped these codes to domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) which will serve as the basis of future theory-based interventions.

resultsTwenty patients who self-identified as 60% female and 85% as non-Hispanic White were included. The results clustered around codes of "perceptions of bariatric surgery," "reasons for not undergoing surgery," and "factors for re-considering surgery." Major drivers of attrition were burden of pre-operative workup requirements, stigma against bariatric surgery, fear of surgery, and anticipated regret. The number and time for requirements led patients to lose their initial optimism about improving health. Perceptions regarding being seen as weak for choosing bariatric surgery, fear of surgery itself, and possible regret over surgery grew as time passed. These drivers mapped to four TDF domains: environmental context and resources, social role and identity, emotion, and beliefs about consequences, respectively.

conclusionsThis study uses the TDF to identify areas of greatest concern for patients to be used for intervention design. This is the first step in understanding how we best support patients who express interest in bariatric surgery achieve their goals and live healthier lives.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryEmotionsFearFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchPatient retentionUptake bariatric surgery

Identifiers

PMID37103571
PMCPMC10136401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.