Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37103183›Full record

ArticleInsects2023

The Interaction of Slaughtering, Drying, and Defatting Methods Differently Affects Oxidative Quality of the Fat from Black Soldier Fly (

Raúl Hurtado-Ribeira, Diego Martín Hernández, David Villanueva-Bermejo, Mónica R García-Risco, M Dolores Hernández, Luis Vázquez, Tiziana Fornari, Diana Martin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Immunometabolic Reprogramming by Black Soldier Fly (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raúl Hurtado-RibeiraDepartamento de Producción y Caracterización de Nuevos Alimentos, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL) (CSIC-UAM), C/Nicolas Cabrera 9, Cantoblanco Campus, 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2948-1250
Diego Martín HernándezDepartamento de Producción y Caracterización de Nuevos Alimentos, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL) (CSIC-UAM), C/Nicolas Cabrera 9, Cantoblanco Campus, 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7058-1240
David Villanueva-BermejoDepartamento de Producción y Caracterización de Nuevos Alimentos, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL) (CSIC-UAM), C/Nicolas Cabrera 9, Cantoblanco Campus, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Mónica R García-RiscoDepartamento de Producción y Caracterización de Nuevos Alimentos, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL) (CSIC-UAM), C/Nicolas Cabrera 9, Cantoblanco Campus, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
M Dolores HernándezInstituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Alimentario (IMIDA), Estación de Acuicultura Marina, Puerto de San Pedro del Pinatar, 30740 Murcia, Spain.
Luis VázquezDepartamento de Producción y Caracterización de Nuevos Alimentos, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL) (CSIC-UAM), C/Nicolas Cabrera 9, Cantoblanco Campus, 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0655-4349
Tiziana FornariDepartamento de Producción y Caracterización de Nuevos Alimentos, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL) (CSIC-UAM), C/Nicolas Cabrera 9, Cantoblanco Campus, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Diana MartinDepartamento de Producción y Caracterización de Nuevos Alimentos, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL) (CSIC-UAM), C/Nicolas Cabrera 9, Cantoblanco Campus, 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1082-9280
Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación · ESInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria · ES

Funding

Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Spain ACUINSECT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interrelation effect of slaughtering, drying, and defatting methods of BSFL on the oxidative quality of the derived fat was studied. Blanching and freezing were compared as slaughtering methods, followed by oven or freeze-drying for drying and mechanical pressing or SFE for defatting. The oxidative state and stability of the extracted fat and defatted meals were monitored immediately after their production, using peroxide value (PV) and Rancimat test, and over 24 weeks of storage. Slaughtering and drying methods had an independent effect on PV, with freezing and freeze-drying being the best methods. Mechanical pressing and SFE were comparable and superior to conventional hexane defatting. Interactions were observed between slaughtering and defatting, drying and defatting, and between all three factors. Generally, freeze-drying combined with any of the slaughtering and defatting methods resulted in the lowest PVs, with mechanical pressing being preferred. Freeze-drying plus mechanical pressing also produced the most stable fats during storage according to the evolution of PV, while the combination of blanching and SFE produced the least stable. A significant correlation was found between the PV at 24 weeks and the antioxidant activity of the fats. Contrary to storage assays, in accelerated Rancimat assays, freeze-dried samples were the least stable, which was partially attributed to the significant correlation with the acid values of the samples. Defatted meals followed a similar pattern to the extracted fat, except for worse oxidation for SFE defatting. Therefore, the different processing methods of slaughtering, drying, and defatting of BSFL differently affect lipid oxidation, with interactions between such successive steps.

Indexed as

antioxidantedible insectsfat extractioninsect mealskillinglipidsoxidative stability

Identifiers

PMID37103183
PMCPMC10142283
OpenAlexW4363674120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.