Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37103100›Full record

ReviewIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Gastric-type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma: Comprehensive Cytopathological Analysis and Comparison With Usual-type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma.

Haeyon Cho, Sujin Park, Hyun-Soo Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haeyon ChoDepartment of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sujin ParkDepartment of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea sujin423.park@samsung.com.
Hyun-Soo KimDepartment of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea hyun-soo.kim@samsung.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimGastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (GEA) is a rare but distinct histological type of gynecological malignancy. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the cytological features of GEA. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe reviewed 18 cytological samples obtained from 14 patients with GEA. All cytology slides were prepared using conventional smear and liquid-based preparations. We examined the differences between the cytological features of GEA and usual-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (UEA).

resultsThe cytological samples of GEA exhibited flat, honeycomb-like cellular sheets (p=0.035), vesicular nuclei (p=0.037) with prominent nucleoli (p=0.037), and vacuolated cytoplasm (p<0.001) more frequently than those of UEA, irrespective of the sampling site and preparation method. UEA showed three-dimensional cellular clusters (p<0.001), peripheral nuclear feathering (p<0.001), and nuclear hyperchromasia (p=0.014) more frequently than GEA.

conclusionGEA can be identified cytologically based on the presence of flat, honeycomb-like sheets of tumor cells possessing vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and abundant vacuolated cytoplasm.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaStomach NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCell NucleusCervix UteriFemaleHumanscervixgastric-type endocervical adenocarcinomaUterus

Identifiers

PMID37103100
PMCPMC10188018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.