Trial reportIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
First RAND-36-Item Health Survey in Three-dimensional Laparoscopy Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study.
Trial report in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimNational healthcare organizers require feedback from patients to improve medical treatment methods. Three-dimensional laparoscopy cholecystectomy (3D-LC) is a modern technique in surgery. However, there are no studies with patient feedback from validated questionnaires assessing the postoperative treatment results in 3D-LC. PATIENTS AND
methodsInitially 200 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were randomized into 3D-LC or mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) groups. RAND-36-Item Health Survey was performed preoperatively and 4 weeks following surgery relating the survey scores between the 3D-LC and MC groups.
resultsSimilar postoperative RAND-36 scores were reported for both groups preoperatively and at 4 weeks following surgery, and no significant differences in RAND-36 domains were shown. When the patients in both study groups were combined, Mental Health (p<0.001), Bodily Pain (p=0.01) and General Health (p=0.016) domain scores were significantly higher, indicating a significantly positive change in quality of life 4 weeks postoperatively, while those for the Role-Physical domain were significantly lower, indicating reduced physical activity during the 4 weeks following surgery. In comparison to the Finnish reference RAND-36 scores, scores at 4 weeks were significantly higher for the Mental Health domain (MC group, p<0.001 and 3D-LC group, p=0.001) whilst scores were significantly lower in four other domains: Physical Functioning, Social Functioning, Bodily Pain and Role-Physical.
conclusionThis study shows, for the first time using the RAND-36-Item Health Survey, relatively similar short-term outcomes in patients 4 weeks following cholecystectomy by 3D-LC and MC. Although scores for three RAND-36 domains were significantly higher postoperatively, indicating a significantly positive change in quality of life, a longer follow-up after cholecystectomy is needed for final conclusions to be drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.