Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37103053›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2023

Determining the Acceptance of Digital Cardiac Rehabilitation and Its Influencing Factors among Patients Affected by Cardiac Diseases.

Alexander Bäuerle, Charlotta Mallien, Tienush Rassaf, Lisa Jahre, Christos Rammos, Eva-Maria Skoda, Martin Teufel, Julia Lortz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patient acceptance of video consultations in cardiology.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander BäuerleClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Charlotta MallienClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0929-3789
Tienush RassafDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8001-0265
Lisa JahreClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Christos RammosDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Eva-Maria SkodaClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Martin TeufelClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Julia LortzDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DEWest German Heart and Vascular Center Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac diseases are a major global health issue with an increasing prevalence of affected people. Rehabilitation following cardiac events is underutilized, despite its proven effectiveness. Digital interventions might present a useful addition to traditional cardiac rehabilitation.

aimsThis study aims to assess the acceptance of mobile health (mHealth) cardiac rehabilitation and to investigate the underlying factors of acceptance in patients with ischemic heart disease and congestive heart failure.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2021 to September 2022 with

resultsThe overall acceptance of mHealth cardiac rehabilitation was high (

conclusionsAs acceptance is associated with the actual use of mHealth, the high level of acceptance found in this study is a promising basis for the future implementation of innovative mHealth offers in cardiac rehabilitation.

Indexed as

cardiac diseaseinternetmHealthrehabilitationUTAUT

Identifiers

PMID37103053
PMCPMC10144862
OpenAlexW4366282387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.