Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37102768›Full record

SynthesisHepatology communications2023

Multidisciplinary care for patients with HCC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Karim Seif El Dahan, Annika Reczek, Darine Daher, Nicole E Rich, Ju Dong Yang, David Hsiehchen, Hao Zhu, Madhukar S Patel, Maria Del Pilar Bayona Molano, Nina Sanford and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hepatology communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment Receipt in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Karim Seif El DahanDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4268-4079
Annika ReczekDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Darine DaherDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9977-1176
Nicole E RichDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2740-8818
Ju Dong YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California,USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7834-9825
David HsiehchenDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9139-302
Hao ZhuDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8417-9698
Madhukar S PatelDepartment of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7508-899
Maria Del Pilar Bayona MolanoDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Nina SanfordDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7840-5700
Purva GopalDepartment of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7125-695
Neehar D ParikhDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5874-9933
Adam C YoppDepartment of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5887-5315
Amit G SingalDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1172-3971
Southwestern Medical Center · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Clinical Validation Center for Lung Cancer Early DetectionU01CA271888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HANASH, SAMIR M · 2022 to 2025
$4.9M
Multilevel factors for racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in prognosis of hepatocellular carcinomaR01MD012565 · NIMHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SINGAL, AMIT, YOPP, ADAM · 2018 to 2022
$4.3M
Multi-level Evaluation of Racial/ethnic Disparities in Liver Disease OutcomesR01CA256977 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI KANWAL, FASIHA, SINGAL, AMIT · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA256977NCI NIH HHS U01 CA271888NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD012565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the complexity of managing HCC, professional society guidelines advocate multidisciplinary care (MDC) for patients with HCC. However, implementation of MDC programs requires a significant investment of time and resources. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to enumerate potential benefits of MDC for patients with HCC.

methodsWe conducted a search of the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and national conference abstracts to identify studies published after January 2005 that reported early-stage presentation, treatment receipt, or overall survival among patients with HCC, stratified by MDC status. We calculated pooled risk ratios and HRs for clinical outcomes according to MDC receipt using the DerSimonian and Laird method for random effects models.

resultsWe identified 12 studies (n = 15,365 patients with HCC) with outcomes stratified by MDC status. MDC was associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.45-0.88); however, its association with curative treatment receipt was not statistically significant (risk ratio = 1.60, 95% CI: 0.89-2.89) and pooled estimates were limited by high heterogeneity (I2 > 90% for both). Studies (n = 3) were discordant regarding an association between MDC and time-to-treatment initiation. MDC was associated with early-stage HCC (risk ratio = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.12-2.29), suggesting possible referral bias contributing to improved outcomes. Limitations of studies also included risk of residual confounding, loss to follow-up, and data preceding the availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

conclusionMDC for patients with HCC is associated with improved overall survival, underscoring the likely benefit of managing patients with HCC in a multidisciplinary care setting.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID37102768
PMCPMC10146543
OpenAlexW4367174551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.