Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37102710›Full record

ArticleAstrobiology2023

Metagenomic Methods for Addressing NASA's Planetary Protection Policy Requirements on Future Missions: A Workshop Report.

Stefan J Green, Tamas Torok, Jonathan E Allen, Emiley Eloe-Fadrosh, Scott A Jackson, Sunny C Jiang, Stuart S Levine, Shawn Levy, Lynn M Schriml, W Kelley Thomas and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Astrobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stefan J GreenGenomics and Microbiome Core Facility, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2781-359X
Tamas TorokEcology Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Jonathan E AllenLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA.
Emiley Eloe-FadroshDOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Scott A JacksonNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Sunny C JiangDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Stuart S LevineMIT BioMicro Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Shawn LevyHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
Lynn M SchrimlInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
W Kelley ThomasHubbard Center for Genome Studies, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA.
Jason M WoodResearch Informatics Core, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Scott W TigheVermont Integrative Genomics, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular biology methods and technologies have advanced substantially over the past decade. These new molecular methods should be incorporated among the standard tools of planetary protection (PP) and could be validated for incorporation by 2026. To address the feasibility of applying modern molecular techniques to such an application, NASA conducted a technology workshop with private industry partners, academics, and government agency stakeholders, along with NASA staff and contractors. The technical discussions and presentations of the Multi-Mission Metagenomics Technology Development Workshop focused on modernizing and supplementing the current PP assays. The goals of the workshop were to assess the state of metagenomics and other advanced molecular techniques in the context of providing a validated framework to supplement the bacterial endospore-based NASA Standard Assay and to identify knowledge and technology gaps. In particular, workshop participants were tasked with discussing metagenomics as a stand-alone technology to provide rapid and comprehensive analysis of total nucleic acids and viable microorganisms on spacecraft surfaces, thereby allowing for the development of tailored and cost-effective microbial reduction plans for each hardware item on a spacecraft. Workshop participants recommended metagenomics approaches as the only data source that can adequately feed into quantitative microbial risk assessment models for evaluating the risk of forward (exploring extraterrestrial planet) and back (Earth harmful biological) contamination. Participants were unanimous that a metagenomics workflow, in tandem with rapid targeted quantitative (digital) PCR, represents a revolutionary advance over existing methods for the assessment of microbial bioburden on spacecraft surfaces. The workshop highlighted low biomass sampling, reagent contamination, and inconsistent bioinformatics data analysis as key areas for technology development. Finally, it was concluded that implementing metagenomics as an additional workflow for addressing concerns of NASA's robotic mission will represent a dramatic improvement in technology advancement for PP and will benefit future missions where mission success is affected by backward and forward contamination.

Indexed as

PlanetsSpace FlightExtraterrestrial EnvironmentHumansMetagenomicsPolicySpacecraftUnited StatesUnited States National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationContaminationDNAMetagenomicsPlanetary protectionSpacecraft Assembly Facility

Identifiers

PMID37102710
PMCPMC10457625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.