Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37102640›Full record

ArticleImmunity, inflammation and disease2023

The validation of artificial anti-monkeypox antibodies by in silico and experimental approaches.

Sadeq Shabani, Mohsen Rashidi, Shakila Radgoudarzi, Ali Jebali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring monkeypox virus proteins and rapid detection techniques.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sadeq ShabaniDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
Mohsen RashidiDepartment Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Shakila RadgoudarziI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Первый МГМУ им), Moscow, Russia.
Ali JebaliDepartment of Medical Nanotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Sciences and Technology, Tehran Medical Science, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1353-3864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a result of smallpox immunization programs that ended more than 40 years ago, a significant portion of the world's population is not immune. Moreover, due to the lack of anti-monkeypox drugs and vaccines against monkeypox, the spread of this virus may be the beginning of another challenge. In this study, novel antibodies against monkeypox virus were modeled based on a heavy chain of human antibody and a small peptide fragment. Docking of modeled antibodies with C19L protein showed the range of docking energy, and root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) was from -124 to -154 kcal/mL and 4-6 angstrom, respectively. Also, docking of modeled antibodies-C19L complex with gamma Fc receptor type I illustrated the range of docking energy, and RMSD was from -132 to -155 kcal/ml and 5-7 angstrom, respectively. Moreover, molecular dynamics simulation showed that antibody 62 had the highest stability with the lowest energy level and RMSD. Interestingly, no modeled antibodies had immunogenicity, allergenicity, and toxicity. Although all of them had good stability, only antibodies 25, 28, 54, and 62 had a half-life of >10 h. Moreover, the interaction between C19L protein and anti-C19L antibodies (wild-type and synthetic) was evaluated by the SPR method. We found that K

Indexed as

Mpox, MonkeypoxAntibodiesHumansMonkeypox virusAntibodiesanti-monkeypox antibodyheavy chainin silicopeptide fragment

Identifiers

PMID37102640
PMCPMC10091375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.