Trial reportHaematologica2023
Randomized phase II study of weekly carfilzomib 70 mg/m
Trial report in Haematologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03336073 (Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Combination With Cyclophosphamide vs. Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Combination With Cyclophosphamide vs. Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: a Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential surrogate endpoint for B-cell hematologic malignancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Belantamab Mafodotin Plus Proteasome Inhibition Efficacy Versus Comparators in Early Relapsed Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.American journal of hematology · 2025Pooled it
- Randomized Phase 3 study of pomalidomide cyclophosphamide dexamethasone versus pomalidomide dexamethasone in relapse or refractory myeloma: an Asian Myeloma Network study (AMN003).Blood cancer journal · 2025Trial
- Real-World Experience of Weekly Carfilzomib in Combination with Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma Relapsed/Refractory to Bortezomib and Lenalidomide.Cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Successful treatment of type I cryoglobulinemia with a combination of carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone: a case report and literature review.International journal of hematology · 2025Review
- Review
- Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: standard of care management of patients in the Gulf region.Clinical hematology international · 2025Review
- Updates on Therapeutic Strategies in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this randomized phase II study (GEM-KyCyDex, clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03336073), the combination of weekly carfilzomib 70 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (KCd) was compared to carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after 1-3 prior lines (PL). One hundred and ninety-seven patients were included and randomized 1:1 to receive KCd (97 patients) or Kd (100 patients) in 28-day cycles until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Patient median age was 70 years, and the median number of PL was one (range, 1-3). More than 90% of patients had previously been exposed to proteasome inhibitors, approximetely 70% to immunomodulators, and approximetely 50% were refractory to their last line (mainly lenalidomide) in both groups. After a median follow-up of 37 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.1 and 16.6 months in KCd and Kd, respectively (P=0.577). Of note, in the post hoc analysis of the lenalidomide-refractory population, the addition of cyclophosphamide to Kd resulted in a significant benefit in terms of PFS: 18.4 versus 11.3 months (hazard ratio =1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-2.7; P=0.043). The overall response rate and the percentage of patients who achieved complete response was around 70% and 20% in both groups. The addition of cyclophosphamide to Kd did not result in any safety signal, except for severe infections (7% vs. 2%). In conclusion, the combination of cyclophosphamide with Kd 70 mg/m2 weekly does not improve outcomes as compared with Kd alone in RRMM after 1-3 PL, but a significant benefit in PFS was observed with the triplet combination in the lenalidomide-refractory population. The administration of weekly carfilzomib 70 mg/m2 was safe and convenient, and, overall, the toxicity was manageable in both arms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.