ArticleJournal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
Overview and knowledge of prosthodontic diagnostic aids among interns and post graduates - A cross-sectional questionnaire study.
Article in Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aims to evaluate and compare the knowledge of prosthodontic diagnostic aids among interns and postgraduates. Settings and Design: A questionnaire survey was conducted to assess and compare the knowledge of prosthodontic diagnostic aids among interns and postgraduates. Based on the pilot study with alpha error 5% and a power of study 80%, the sample size was estimated to be 858 for each group. Materials and Methods: The self constructed questionnaire consisted of 3 sections, of which each section had 5 questions, a total of 15 questions validated by a team of 6 experts. The questionnaire was distributed electronically among interns and postgraduates in various dental colleges across India. Data were collected and subjected to statistical analysis. Statistical Analysis: All outcomes of this survey were analyzed using an independent t test. The Mann- Whitney test was used to determine the significance of two groups. Results: From the results obtained, it was found that interns (mean: 6.90; standard deviation: 2.442) had less knowledge regarding diagnostic tools than postgraduate students (mean: 8.76; standard deviation: 1.818). Conclusion: Diagnostic aids simplifies the process of diagnosis and treatment planning. Moreover, the knowledge of diagnostic aids among younger generation permits them to redefine the way dentistry is practiced and at the same time helps to provide better treatment results and achieve the utmost for the profession. Adequate knowledge of diagnostic aids is the need of the hour. Dental professionals should constantly update knowledge regarding various diagnostic aids in Prosthodontics, so as to arrive at optimum diagnosis and treatment plan with longer prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.