Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37102505›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Patterning precision under non-linear morphogen decay and molecular noise.

Jan Andreas Adelmann, Roman Vetter, Dagmar Iber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Position-dependent feedback drives scaling and robustness of morphogen gradients.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Morphogens in the evolution of size, shape and patterning.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Collective effects of cell cleavage dynamics.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The impact of cell size on morphogen gradient precision.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jan Andreas AdelmannDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0876-3363
Roman VetterDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2901-7036
Dagmar IberDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8051-1035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphogen gradients can instruct cells about their position in a patterned tissue. Non-linear morphogen decay has been suggested to increase gradient precision by reducing the sensitivity to variability in the morphogen source. Here, we use cell-based simulations to quantitatively compare the positional error of gradients for linear and non-linear morphogen decay. While we confirm that non-linear decay reduces the positional error close to the source, the reduction is very small for physiological noise levels. Far from the source, the positional error is much larger for non-linear decay in tissues that pose a flux barrier to the morphogen at the boundary. In light of this new data, a physiological role of morphogen decay dynamics in patterning precision appears unlikely.

Indexed as

Body PatterningModels, Biologicalcell-based simulationcomputational biologydevelopmental biologymorphogen gradientnonenon-linear decayprecisionsystems biologytissue patterning

Identifiers

PMID37102505
PMCPMC10139688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.