ReviewRevista de neurologia2023
[Use of isoflurane as treatment for super-refractory status epilepticus].
Review in Revista de neurologia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSuper-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is a neurological condition with an important morbidity and mortality rate, for which few therapeutic options are available. Inhalation sedation with isoflurane is currently a compassionate-use treatment in Spanish intensive care units. Little has been written about its usefulness in the treatment of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus, but it appears to be a useful and safe therapeutic alternative for this condition. CASE REPORTS: This article reviews three cases of SRSE treated with isoflurane. The capacity of isoflurane to control seizures was assessed by electroencephalographic monitoring. Other variables assessed were time to seizure control, survival, functional outcome and occurrence of complications secondary to isoflurane. In the three cases reviewed, isoflurane proved to be effective for seizure control in patients affected by SRSE. Seizure control was accomplished quickly and the minimum dose required to obtain a burst-suppression pattern was titrated easily and rapidly. Despite controlling epilepsy, high mortality was observed (66.66%). This is explained by both the mortality of SRSE and the underlying pathologies of the patients who died. The use of isoflurane did not give rise to any complications.
conclusionWith the results obtained, it is feasible to think that the use of isoflurane is not related to lesions in the central nervous system reported in other articles, and this treatment can be considered effective and safe for the control of SRSE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.