ArticleClinical & experimental ophthalmology2023
Efficacy and accuracy of artificial intelligence to overlay multimodal images from different optical instruments in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.
Article in Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leveraging large scale deep learning models for diagnosis and visual outcome prediction in retinitis pigmentosa.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Early detection and staging of retinitis pigmentosa using multifocal electroretinogram parameters and machine learning algorithms.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- Pointwise Structure-Function Analysis of the Ellipsoid Zone in Retinitis Pigmentosa Using an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted OCT and Microperimetry Overlay.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRetinitis pigmentosa (RP) represents a group of progressive, genetically heterogenous blinding diseases. Recently, relationships between measures of retinal function and structure are needed to help identify outcome measures or biomarkers for clinical trials. The ability to align retinal multimodal images, taken on different platforms, will allow better understanding of this relationship. We investigate the efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI) in overlaying different multimodal retinal images in RP patients.
methodsWe overlayed infrared images from microperimetry on near-infra-red images from scanning laser ophthalmoscope and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in RP patients using manual alignment and AI. The AI adopted a two-step framework and was trained on a separate dataset. Manual alignment was performed using in-house software that allowed labelling of six key points located at vessel bifurcations. Manual overlay was considered successful if the distance between same key points on the overlayed images was ≤1/2°.
resultsFifty-seven eyes of 32 patients were included in the analysis. AI was significantly more accurate and successful in aligning images compared to manual alignment as confirmed by linear mixed-effects modelling (p < 0.001). A receiver operating characteristic analysis, used to compute the area under the curve of the AI (0.991) and manual (0.835) Dice coefficients in relation to their respective 'truth' values, found AI significantly more accurate in the overlay (p < 0.001).
conclusionAI was significantly more accurate than manual alignment in overlaying multimodal retinal imaging in RP patients and showed the potential to use AI algorithms for future multimodal clinical and research applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.