Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37102125›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in toxicology2023

Assessing the sensitivity and specificity of phosphatidylethanol (PEth) cutoffs to identify alcohol exposed pregnancies.

Julie M Hasken, Anna-Susan Marais, Marlene M de Vries, Wendy O Kalberg, David Buckley, Charles D H Parry, Soraya Seedat, Philip A May

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Screening of substance use in pregnancy: A Danish cross-sectional study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Julie M HaskenUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Nutrition Research Institute, Kannapolis, NC, United States.
Anna-Susan MaraisStellenbosch University, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tygerberg, South Africa.
Marlene M de VriesStellenbosch University, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tygerberg, South Africa.
Wendy O KalbergCenter on Alcohol, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
David BuckleyCenter on Alcohol, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Charles D H ParryStellenbosch University, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tygerberg, South Africa.
Soraya SeedatStellenbosch University, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tygerberg, South Africa.
Philip A MayUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Nutrition Research Institute, Kannapolis, NC, United States.
Stellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USSouth African Medical Research Council · ZA

Funding

Trajectory of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) Across the Lifespan: Continuing Prevention and Longitudinal EpidemiologyR01AA015134 · NIAAA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MAY, PHILIP ALAN · 2006 to 2022
$4.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the literature on alcohol use biomarkers, there has been debate as to what a valid and/or utilitarian cut off level should be for various research applications. In this manuscript, we assessed the sensitivity and specificity of multiple cutoff values for phosphatidylethanol (PEth) from bloodspots relative to self-report, the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) scores, and another alcohol use biomarker ethyl glucuronide (EtG) from fingernails in a sample of 222 pregnant women in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the area under the curve (AUC) and assess PEth cutoff values of ≥2, ≥4, ≥8, ≥14, and ≥20 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml). The highest AUC value was attained when PEth was compared to an AUDIT score of 1 or more. Depending on the cutoff used to determine alcohol consumption, PEth identified 47%-70% of the individuals as alcohol-consuming while 62.6%-75.2% were identified by self-reported measures, and 35.6% were identified by EtG. In this sample, sensitivity and accuracy were highest at less stringent PEth cutoffs when compared to self-report, AUDIT score of 1 or more, 5 or more, 8 or more, and EtG ≥ 8 picograms per milligram (pg/mg). For research purposes, less stringent cutoffs, such as PEth ≥ 8 ng/ml, may be considered a valid, positive cutoff for identifying women who consume alcohol during pregnancy in this population. A cutoff of PEth ≥ 20 ng/ml may miss individuals who reported consuming alcohol (false negatives).

Indexed as

Alcohol useAlcohol use biomarkersEthyl glucuronide (EtG)Phosphatidylethanol (PEth)PregnancySelf-reported alcohol use

Identifiers

PMID37102125
PMCPMC10123138
OpenAlexW4362632682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.