Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101973›Full record

ArticleScientometrics2023

Is open science a double-edged sword?: data sharing and the changing citation pattern of Chinese economics articles.

Liwei Zhang, Liang Ma

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientometrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Liwei ZhangSchool of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Shandong University, 72 Binhai Road, Jimo District, Qingdao, Shandong Province 266237 China.
Liang MaSchool of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, 59 Zhongguancun Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing, 100872 China.ORCID 0000-0002-8779-5891

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data sharing is an important part of open science (OS), and more and more institutions and journals have been enforcing open data (OD) policies. OD is advocated to help increase academic influences and promote scientific discovery and development, but such a proposition has not been elaborated on well. This study explores the nuanced effects of the OD policies on the citation pattern of articles by using the case of Chinese economics journals. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11192-023-04684-8.

Indexed as

CitationsCiting lifeOpen dataOpen scienceResearch quality

Identifiers

PMID37101973
PMCPMC10028759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.