Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101887›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2023

Excellent Correlation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Score With Legacy Outcome Scores Preoperatively and at 1 Year After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Dan Gordon, Yaniv Pines, Matthew G Alben, Erel Ben-Ari, Andrew S Rokito, Young W Kwon, Joseph D Zuckerman, Mandeep S Virk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dan GordonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A.
Yaniv PinesDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Matthew G AlbenDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Erel Ben-AriDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Hashomer "Sheba" Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Andrew S RokitoDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Young W KwonDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Joseph D ZuckermanDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Mandeep S VirkDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York, U.S.A.
New York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital · USBaylor University Medical Center · USSheba Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the preoperative and postoperative performance of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (PROMIS-UE, version 2.0) outcome score in comparison to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) instruments in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. Methods: This prospective longitudinal study included 91 patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. Patients completed the PROMIS-UE, ASES, and WORC instruments preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months. The Pearson correlation coefficient ( Results: The PROMIS-UE instrument showed good to excellent correlation with the legacy instruments at all time points. There were variations in the measured effect sizes of the various instruments, with the PROMIS-UE instrument showing responsiveness to change at 3 and 12 months but the ASES and WORC instruments showing responsiveness at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months. Both PROMIS-UE and ASES scores displayed ceiling effects at 12 months. Conclusions: The PROMIS-UE instrument shows excellent correlation with the ASES instrument and a rotator cuff-specific outcome instrument-the WORC instrument-preoperatively and at 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Variations in the measured effect sizes at different postoperative time points and high ceiling effects of the PROMIS-UE instrument at the 1-year time point may limit its utility in the early postoperative phase and at long-term follow-up after rotator cuff repair. Clinical Relevance: The performance of the PROMIS-UE outcome measure after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was investigated.

Identifiers

PMID37101887
PMCPMC10123413
OpenAlexW4319302409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.