Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101865›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2023

Grid and Image Intensifier Improve Arthroscopic ACL Tunnel Position and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Sudeep Kumar, Anup Kumar, Ravi Kumar, Charan Teja Kv, Mohammed Roshen Ar, Alapati Hari Venkata Bramesh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Validation of CLASS MRI for personalized ACL footprints identification.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sudeep KumarDepartment of Orthopaedics, AIIMS-Patna, Patna, Bihar, India.
Anup KumarDepartment of Orthopaedics, AIIMS-Patna, Patna, Bihar, India.
Ravi KumarCisro Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India.
Charan Teja KvDepartment of Orthopaedics, AIIMS-Patna, Patna, Bihar, India.
Mohammed Roshen ArDepartment of Orthopaedics, AIIMS-Patna, Patna, Bihar, India.
Alapati Hari Venkata BrameshDepartment of Orthopaedics, AIIMS-Patna, Patna, Bihar, India.
National Institute of Technology Patna · INPatna Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy in the femoral and tibial tunnel placement after the use of fluoroscopy along with an indigenously designed grid method to assist in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction as compared with the tunnel placement without using them and to validate the findings with computed tomography scan performed postoperatively along with assessing the functional outcome at a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Methods: This was a prospective study conducted on patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patients were included and segregated into a nonfluoroscopy (group B) and a fluoroscopy group (group A), and both had postoperative computed tomography scans so that femoral and tibial tunnel position could be evaluated. Scheduled follow-up occurred 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months' postoperatively. Patients were evaluated objectively with the Lachman test, measurement of range of motion, and functional outcome using patient-reported outcome measures, i.e., Tegner Lysholm Knee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee score. Results: A total of 113 subjects were included. There were 53 in group A and 60 in group B. The average location of femoral tunnel showed significant differences between the 2 groups. However, the variability in femoral tunnel location was significantly lower in group A as compared with group B for proximal-distal planes only. The average location of the tibial tunnel as per the grid of Bernard et al. showed significant differences in both the planes. The variability in tibial tunnel was greater in the medial-lateral plane as compared with the anterior-posterior plane. There was a statistically significant difference in mean value of the 3 scores among the 2 groups. The variability of the scores was greater in group B as compared with group A. None of the patient was reported as a failure. Conclusions: The results of our study suggests that fluoroscopy-guided positioning using a grid technique increases the accuracy of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel positioning with decreased variability and is associated with better patient-reported outcomes 3 years after surgery compared with tunnel positioning using landmarks. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective, comparative therapeutic trial.

Identifiers

PMID37101865
PMCPMC10123436
OpenAlexW4319455816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.