Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101775›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2023

Ileal Conduit Versus Orthotopic Neobladder Urinary Diversion in Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from a Multi-institutional Series.

Stefano Tappero, Paolo Dell'Oglio, Maria Angela Cerruto, Rafael Sanchez Salas, Oscar Buisan Rueda, Giuseppe Simone, Kees Hendricksen, Francesco Soria, Paolo Umari, Alessandro Antonelli and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.

Stefano TapperoDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Paolo Dell'OglioDepartment of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Maria Angela CerrutoDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Rafael Sanchez SalasDepartment of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
Oscar Buisan RuedaDepartment of Urology, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Giuseppe SimoneDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Kees HendricksenDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Francesco SoriaDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy.
Paolo UmariDivision of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Alessandro AntonelliDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Alberto BrigantiUniversity Vita- Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Francesco MontorsiUniversity Vita- Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Ottavio de CobelliDepartment of Urology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Carlo TerroneDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Antonio GalfanoDepartment of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Marco MoschiniUniversity Vita- Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Ettore Di TrapaniDepartment of Urology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists EAU-YAU: Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Verona · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESInstitute Mutualiste Montsouris · FRIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Head-to-head comparisons between ileal conduit (IC) and orthotopic neobladder (ONB) in terms of peri- and postoperative outcomes and complications, in the specific setting of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), are not available. Objective: To address the impact of the type of urinary diversion (UD, IC vs ONB) on RARC morbidity, as well as operative time (OT), length of stay (LOS), and readmissions. Design setting and participants: Urothelial bladder cancer patients treated with RARC at nine high-volume European institutions between 2008 and 2020 were identified. Intervention: RARC with either IC or ONB. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Intra- and postoperative complications were collected and reported according to the Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards recommendations and European Association of Urology guidelines, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression models tested the impact of UD on outcomes, after adjustment for clustering at single hospital level. Results and limitations: Overall, 555 nonmetastatic RARC patients were identified. In 280 (51%) and 275 (49%) patients, an IC and an ONB were performed, respectively. Eighteen intraoperative complications were recorded. The rates of intraoperative complications were 4% in IC patients and 3% in ONB patients ( Conclusions: Compared with RARC with ONB, RARC with IC is less prone to UD-related postoperative complications, prolonged OT, and prolonged LOS. Patient summary: To date, the impact of the type of urinary diversion, namely, ileal conduit versus orthotopic neobladder, on peri- and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy is unknown. Based on a rigorous data accrual, which relied on established complication reporting systems (Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards and European Association of Urology recommended systems), we reported intra- and postoperative complications according to urinary diversion type. Moreover, we found that ileal conduit was associated with lower operative time and length of stay, and yielded a protective effect in terms of urinary diversion-related complications.

Indexed as

Ileal conduitOrthotopic neobladderRadical cystectomyRobotic surgeryUrothelial bladder cancer

Identifiers

PMID37101775
PMCPMC10123439
OpenAlexW4321381316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.