ArticleERJ open research2023
Short-acting β
Article in ERJ open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatable traits in paediatric bronchiectasis: current practice and a proposed checklist.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lung Function and Treatment Decisions in Children with Asthma: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Development of an Asthma Exacerbation Risk Prediction Model for Conversational Use by Adults in England.Pragmatic and observational research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prescription of three or more short-acting β Methods: This study analysed data on children and adolescents with asthma in three age cohorts: 1‒5 years, 6‒11 years and 12‒17 years from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum database for the period 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2019. Associations between SABA prescriptions (three or more Results: Overall 48 560, 110 091 and 111 891 paediatric patients with asthma were aged 1‒5, 6‒11 and 12‒17 years, respectively. During the baseline period, 22 423 (46.2%), 42 137 (38.3%) and 40 288 (36.0%) in these three age cohorts, respectively, were prescribed three or more SABA canisters per year. Across all age ranges, the rate of future asthma exacerbations in those prescribed three or more Conclusion: In children, higher SABA prescriptions at baseline were associated with increased future exacerbation rates. These findings highlight the need for monitoring prescription of three or more SABA canisters per year to identify children with asthma at risk of exacerbations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.