Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101692›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2023

HDFCN: A Robust Hybrid Deep Network Based on Feature Concatenation for Cervical Cancer Diagnosis on WSI Pap Smear Slides.

Nitin Kumar Chauhan, Krishna Singh, Amit Kumar, Swapnil Baburav Kolambakar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nitin Kumar ChauhanUSIC&T, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, New Delhi 110078, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4139-8038
Krishna SinghDSEU Okhla Campus-I, Formerly G. B. Pant Engineering College, New Delhi 110020, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1909-1320
Amit KumarDepartment of ECE, Indore Institute of Science & Technology, Indore 453331, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8533-2236
Swapnil Baburav KolambakarBluecrest university college, Monrovia, Liberia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3359-8090
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University · INInstitute of Science and TechnologyUniversity of Liberia · LR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a critical imperilment to a female's health due to its malignancy and fatality rate. The disease can be thoroughly cured by locating and treating the infected tissues in the preliminary phase. The traditional practice for screening cervical cancer is the examination of cervix tissues using the Papanicolaou (Pap) test. Manual inspection of pap smears involves false-negative outcomes due to human error even in the presence of the infected sample. Automated computer vision diagnosis revamps this obstacle and plays a substantial role in screening abnormal tissues affected due to cervical cancer. Here, in this paper, we propose a hybrid deep feature concatenated network (HDFCN) following two-step data augmentation to detect cervical cancer for binary and multiclass classification on the Pap smear images. This network carries out the classification of malignant samples for whole slide images (WSI) of the openly accessible SIPaKMeD database by utilizing the concatenation of features extracted from the fine-tuning of the deep learning (DL) models, namely, VGG-16, ResNet-152, and DenseNet-169, pretrained on the ImageNet dataset. The performance outcomes of the proposed model are compared with the individual performances of the aforementioned DL networks using transfer learning (TL). Our proposed model achieved an accuracy of 97.45% and 99.29% for 5-class and 2-class classifications, respectively. Additionally, the experiment is performed to classify liquid-based cytology (LBC) WSI data containing pap smear images.

Indexed as

Cervix UteriUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPapanicolaou TestVaginal Smears

Identifiers

PMID37101692
PMCPMC10125740
OpenAlexW4366292944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.