ArticleHeliyon2023
Typical localised element-specific finite element anterior eye model.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Corneal Endothelial Barrier Function Based on "Y-Junctions": A Finite Element Analysis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- FEA-Based Stress-Strain Barometers as Forecasters for Corneal Refractive Power Change in Orthokeratology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The study presents an averaged anterior eye geometry model combined with a localised material model that is straightforward, appropriate and amenable for implementation in finite element (FE) modelling. Methods: Both right and left eye profile data of 118 subjects (63 females and 55 males) aged 22-67 years (38.5 ± 7.6) were used to build an averaged geometry model. Parametric representation of the averaged geometry model was achieved through two polynomials dividing the eye into three smoothly connected volumes. This study utilised the collagen microstructure x-ray data of 6 ex-vivo healthy human eyes, 3 right eyes and 3 left eyes in pairs from 3 donors, 1 male and 2 females aged between 60 and 80 years, to build a localised element-specific material model for the eye. Results: Fitting the cornea and the posterior sclera sections to a 5th-order Zernike polynomial resulted in 21 coefficients. The averaged anterior eye geometry model recorded a limbus tangent angle of 37° at a radius of 6.6 mm from the corneal apex. In terms of material models, the difference between the stresses generated in the inflation simulation up to 15 mmHg in the ring-segmented material model and localised element-specific material model were significantly different (p < 0.001) with the ring-segmented material model recording average Von-Mises stress 0.0168 ± 0.0046 MPa and the localised element-specific material model recording average Von-Mises stress 0.0144 ± 0.0025 MPa. Conclusions: The study illustrates an averaged geometry model of the anterior human eye that is easy to generate through two parametric equations. This model is combined with a localised material model that can be used either parametrically through a Zernike fitted polynomial or non-parametrically as a function of the azimuth angle and the elevation angle of the eye globe. Both averaged geometry and localised material models were built in a way that makes them easy to implement in FE analysis without additional computation cost compared to the limbal discontinuity so-called idealised eye geometry model or ring-segmented material model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.