Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101535›Full record

ReviewCritical care explorations2023

Vasopressin Use in the Support of Organ Donors: Physiological Rationale and Review of the Literature.

Sofiane Ouerd, Anne Julie Frenette, David Williamson, Karim Serri, Frederick D'Aragon, Daniel G Bichet, Emmanuel Charbonney

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care explorations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sofiane OuerdDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anne Julie FrenetteDepartment of Pharmacy CIUSSS du nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Sacré-Coeur Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
David WilliamsonDepartment of Pharmacy and Research Center, CIUSSS du nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Sacré-Coeur Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Karim SerriCritical Care Division, Department of Medicine, Centre de Recherche du CIUSSS du nord-de-l'Île-de Montréal, Hôpital Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Frederick D'AragonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Daniel G BichetDepartments of Medicine and Molecular and Integrative Physiology, Université de Montréal Research Center, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Emmanuel CharbonneyCritical Care Division, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Université de Montréal · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this review was to depict the physiological and clinical rationale for the use of vasopressin in hemodynamic support of organ donors. After summarizing the physiological, pharmacological concepts and preclinical findings, regarding vasopressin's pathophysiological impacts, we will present the available clinical data. DATA SOURCES: Detailed search strategies in PubMed, OVID Medline, and EMBASE were undertaken using Medical Subject Headings and Key Words. STUDY SELECTION: Physiological articles regarding brain death, and preclinical animal and human studies about the use of vasopressin or analogs, as an intervention in organ support for donation, were considered. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text of articles to determine eligibility. Data encompassing models, population, methodology, outcomes, and relevant concepts were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Following brain death, profound reduction in sympathetic outflow is associated with reduced cardiac output, vascular tone, and hemodynamic instability in donors. In addition to reducing catecholamine needs and reversing diabetes insipidus, vasopressin has been shown to limit pulmonary injury and decrease systemic inflammatory response in animals. Several observational studies show the benefit of vasopressin on hemodynamic parameters and catecholamine sparing in donors. Small trials suggest that vasopressin increase organ procurement and have some survival benefit for recipients. However, the risk of bias is overall concerning, and therefore the quality of the evidence is deemed low.

conclusionsDespite potential impact on graft outcome and a protective effect through catecholamine support sparing, the benefit of vasopressin use in organ donors is based on low evidence. Well-designed observational and randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Indexed as

catecholamineshemodynamic supportorgan donationorgan procurementvasopressin

Identifiers

PMID37101535
PMCPMC10125506
OpenAlexW4366817779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.