ArticleHeliyon2023
Applying a multi-criteria decision-making approach to identify key satisfaction gaps in hospital nurses' work environment.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Critical Variables and Critical Gap Variables in Hospital Nurses' Job Satisfaction During the Dynamic Adjustment Phase of COVID-19 Prevention in China: A Hybrid Machine Learning and Decision Analysis Approach.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Nurses' Work Methods Assessment Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Article
- A historical review and analysis on MOORA and its fuzzy extensions for different applications.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Applied artificial intelligence: Acceptance-intention-purchase and satisfaction on smartwatch usage in a Ghanaian context.Heliyon · 2023Article
- What Is the Mediating Role of Communication Skills and Sexual Satisfaction between Job and Life Satisfaction of Healthcare Employees?Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: A decision analysis model was constructed to explore the key factors affecting the job satisfaction of hospital nurses and to analyze the key satisfaction gaps in the case hospital. Background: In China, medical institutions are facing greater pressure and challenges in the normalization of epidemic prevention and control. Nurses play a critical role in the delivery of medical care services. Past studies have shown that improving job satisfaction among hospital nurses is important for both reducing nurse turnover and improving the quality of care. Methods: McCloskey/Mueller satisfaction scale (MMSS-31) was used to survey 25 nursing specialists in a case hospital in Zhejiang. Then, the Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relation (CFPR) method was used to analyze the degree of importance of dimensions and corresponding sub-criteria. Finally, the importance-performance analysis method was applied to identify critical satisfaction gaps for the case hospital. Results: In terms of local weight for dimensions, "Control/Responsibility ( Conclusion: The issues that nurses care about but for which they have not attained expectations mainly involved extrinsic rewards, recognition/encouragement and control over their working process. The findings of this study could offer an academic reference for management and remind them to consider the above factors in exploring future reform, further improving nurses' job satisfaction and motivating them to provide better nursing services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.