Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101482›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

Intracranial hemorrhage management in the multi-omics era.

Xianjing Feng, Xi Li, Jie Feng, Jian Xia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xianjing FengDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xi LiDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jie FengDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jian XiaDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a devastating disorder. Neuroprotective strategies that prevent tissue injury and improve functional outcomes have been identified in multiple animal models of ICH. However, these potential interventions in clinical trials produced generally disappointing results. With progress in omics, studies of omics data, including genomics, transcriptomics, epigenetics, proteomics, metabolomics, and the gut microbiome, may help promote precision medicine. In this review, we focused on introducing the applications of all omics in ICH and shed light on all of the considerable advantages to systematically analyze the necessity and importance of multiple omics technology in ICH.

Indexed as

Intracranial hemorrhageMulti-omics

Identifiers

PMID37101482
PMCPMC10123201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.