ArticleHeliyon2023
Excellent performance of hybrid model manufactured via additive manufacturing process reinforced with GFRP for sport climbing equipment.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental, numerical, and DIC analysis of high-performance VPP composites with multilayer glass fiber reinforcement.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Surface roughness and dimension accuracy data from hybrid manufacturing process using PLA material.Data in brief · 2024Article
- Article
- Carbon Fiber 3D Printing: Technologies and Performance-A Brief Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Excellent Characteristics of Environmentally Friendly 3D-Printed Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Medical Sample Collection.Polymers · 2023Article
- Feasibility of 3D-Printed Locking Compression Plates with Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) in Tibial Comminuted Diaphyseal Fractures.Polymers · 2023Article
- The Interconnection of Carbon Active Addition on Mechanical Properties of Hybrid Agel/Glass Fiber-Reinforced Green Composite.Polymers · 2023Article
- Influence of Post-Processing on the Properties of Multi-Material Parts Obtained by Material Projection AM.Polymers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The figure eight model was successfully manufactured, analyzed, and characterized in the present study. The model was manufactured via 3D printing fused deposition modelling (FDM) and then reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymers (GFRP). There are three different designs in figure eight that are examined, and each design is made using 3D printing FDM and coated with GFRP, a hybrid material, as shown. Specimens that have been made from each design are then evaluated by tensile test, hardness test, surface roughness test, and density test. The results showed that the hybrid figure eight lamination with polylactic acid (PLA) and GFRP material could increase the tensile strength by more than two times higher. The highest tensile strength lies in design 1 with 4977, 3 N. Moreover, the highest hardness value occurred for design two at 75.1 Shore D, and the highest average density lies in design three at 1.2 g/mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.