Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101455›Full record

ReviewACS environmental Au2022

Retrieval, Selection, and Evaluation of Chemical Property Data for Assessments of Chemical Emissions, Fate, Hazard, Exposure, and Risks.

Li Li, Zhizhen Zhang, Yujie Men, Sivani Baskaran, Alessandro Sangion, Shenghong Wang, Jon A Arnot, Frank Wania

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS environmental Au, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hydroxyl radical oxidation of chemical contaminants on indoor surfaces and dust.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Li LiSchool of Public Health, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, Nevada 89557, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5157-7366
Zhizhen ZhangSchool of Public Health, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, Nevada 89557, United States.
Yujie MenDepartment of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California 92521, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9811-3828
Sivani BaskaranDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, Canada.
Alessandro SangionDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, Canada.
Shenghong WangSchool of Public Health, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, Nevada 89557, United States.
Jon A ArnotDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4295-4270
Frank WaniaDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3836-0901

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable chemical property data are the key to defensible and unbiased assessments of chemical emissions, fate, hazard, exposure, and risks. However, the retrieval, evaluation, and use of reliable chemical property data can often be a formidable challenge for chemical assessors and model users. This comprehensive review provides practical guidance for use of chemical property data in chemical assessments. We assemble available sources for obtaining experimentally derived and in silico predicted property data; we also elaborate strategies for evaluating and curating the obtained property data. We demonstrate that both experimentally derived and in silico predicted property data can be subject to considerable uncertainty and variability. Chemical assessors are encouraged to use property data derived through the harmonization of multiple carefully selected experimental data if a sufficient number of reliable laboratory measurements is available or through the consensus consolidation of predictions from multiple in silico tools if the data pool from laboratory measurements is not adequate.

Identifiers

PMID37101455
PMCPMC10125307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.