ReviewRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
Occupational accidents in healthcare workers: a bibliometric analysis in Scopus database 2010-2019.
Review in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety-specific transformational leadership and safety outcomes at workplaces: a scoping review study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Research topics in occupational medicine, 1990-2022: A text-mining-applied bibliometric study.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scientific publications in the occupational area have a growing trend towards management of safety in the workplace, despite lack of knowledge on the distribution and characteristics of scientific evidence on occupational accidents in healthcare professionals. This study aims to determine the characteristics and collaboration networks of publications, the co-occurrence of terms, and the main journals on occupational accidents in healthcare professionals among publications indexed in Scopus from 2010 to 2019. This is an observational, cross-sectional, bibliometric study based on publications indexed in the Scopus database. The indicators were number of publications per year, main journals of publication and its quality index, collaboration networks between authors, and co-occurrence of terms. The predominant language of publication was English, the main type of study was the observational one, and nursing professionals represent the main group of interest (31.14% of the articles), contrary to radiologists and/or physical therapists (4% each). The main source of publication about occupational accidents was
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.