Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101416›Full record

SynthesisOccupational medicine (Oxford, England)2023

Duration-response association between occupational exposure and pancreatic cancer risk: meta-analysis.

H Boonhat, A P Pratama, J-T Lin, R-T Lin

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Occupational medicine (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H BoonhatGraduate Institute of Public Health, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung 406040, Taiwan.
A P PratamaGraduate Institute of Public Health, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung 406040, Taiwan.
J-T LinDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan.
R-T LinDepartment of Occupational Safety and Health, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung 406040, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2687-203X

Funding

China Medical UniversityNational Science and Technology CouncilTaiwan CMU109-S-30
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence is lacking on the occupational exposure time window to chemical agents related to pancreatic cancer risk.

aimsThis study performed meta-regression and meta-analysis to examine the dose-response association between occupational exposure duration to chemical agents and pancreatic cancer risk.

methodsWe searched and reviewed studies on exposure duration and pancreatic cancer in five databases (Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, ScienceDirect and Web of Science) from inception to 16 May 2022. Exposure refers to the years a worker was exposed to any chemical agent, and outcome variables were pancreatic cancer incidence and mortality.

resultsWe identified 31 studies, including 288 389 participants. In the meta-regression, the positive dose-response association indicated pancreatic cancer risk increased slightly with every additional year of exposure duration (slope = 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.02). Pancreatic cancer risk increased with an exposure duration of 1-10 (relative risk [RR] = 1.04; 95% CI 1.02-1.06), 11-20 (RR = 1.11; 95% CI 1.05-1.16), and 21-30 years (RR = 1.39; 95% CI 1.12-1.73).

conclusionsPancreatic cancer risk increased as occupational exposure duration increased, with an exposure time window ranging from 1 to 30 years.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposurePancreatic NeoplasmsHumansIncidenceRisk

Identifiers

PMID37101416
PMCPMC10195200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.