Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101394›Full record

Observational studyCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2023

Modeling Alzheimer's disease progression utilizing clinical trial and ADNI data to predict longitudinal trajectory of CDR-SB.

Samira Jamalian, Michael Dolton, Pascal Chanu, Vidya Ramakrishnan, Yesenia Franco, Kristin Wildsmith, Paul Manser, Edmond Teng, Jin Y Jin, Angelica Quartino and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Samira JamalianGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Michael DoltonRoche Products Australia Pty Ltd., Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Pascal ChanuGenentech/Roche, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9011-5431
Vidya RamakrishnanGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7726-6278
Yesenia FrancoGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Kristin WildsmithGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Paul ManserGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Edmond TengGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Jin Y JinGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3627-0323
Angelica QuartinoGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0184-4670
Joy C HsuGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Genentech, Inc.National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is strong interest in developing predictive models to better understand individual heterogeneity and disease progression in Alzheimer's disease (AD). We have built upon previous longitudinal AD progression models, using a nonlinear, mixed-effect modeling approach to predict Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) progression. Data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (observational study) and placebo arms from four interventional trials (N = 1093) were used for model building. The placebo arms from two additional interventional trials (N = 805) were used for external model validation. In this modeling framework, CDR-SB progression over the disease trajectory timescale was obtained for each participant by estimating disease onset time (DOT). Disease progression following DOT was described by both global progression rate (RATE) and individual progression rate (α). Baseline Mini-Mental State Examination and CDR-SB scores described the interindividual variabilities in DOT and α well. This model successfully predicted outcomes in the external validation datasets, supporting its suitability for prospective prediction and use in design of future trials. By predicting individual participants' disease progression trajectories using baseline characteristics and comparing these against the observed responses to new agents, the model can help assess treatment effects and support decision making for future trials.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDisease ProgressionHumansMental Status and Dementia TestsProspective StudiesResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID37101394
PMCPMC10349194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.