Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101258›Full record

ReviewBMC palliative care2023

Palliative care and new technologies. The use of smart sensor technologies and its impact on the Total Care principle.

Tabea Ott, Maria Heckel, Natalie Öhl, Tobias Steigleder, Nils C Albrecht, Christoph Ostgathe, Peter Dabrock

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC palliative care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tabea OttChair of Systematic Theology II (Ethics), Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Theology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kochstraße 6, Erlangen, 91054, Germany. tabea.ott@fau.de.
Maria HeckelDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Werner-von-Siemens-Straße 34, Erlangen, 91052, Germany.
Natalie ÖhlDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Werner-von-Siemens-Straße 34, Erlangen, 91052, Germany.
Tobias SteiglederDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Werner-von-Siemens-Straße 34, Erlangen, 91052, Germany.
Nils C AlbrechtInstitute for High Frequency Technology, Hamburg University of Technology, Denickestraße 22 (I), 21073, Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph OstgatheDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Werner-von-Siemens-Straße 34, Erlangen, 91052, Germany.
Peter DabrockChair of Systematic Theology II (Ethics), Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Theology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kochstraße 6, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) SFB 1483 - Project-ID 442419336, EmpkinS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliative care is an integral part of health care, which in term has become increasingly technologized in recent decades. Lately, innovative smart sensors combined with artificial intelligence promise better diagnosis and treatment. But to date, it is unclear: how are palliative care concepts and their underlying assumptions about humans challenged by smart sensor technologies (SST) and how can care benefit from SST?

aimsThe paper aims to identify changes and challenges in palliative care due to the use of SST. In addition, normative guiding criteria for the use of SST are developed.

methodsThe principle of Total Care used by the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) forms the basis for the ethical analysis. Drawing on this, its underlying conceptions of the human and its socio-ethical aspects are examined with a phenomenological focus. In the second step, the advantages, limitations, and socio-ethical challenges of using SST with respect to the Total Care principle are explored. Finally, ethical-normative requirements for the application of SST are derived. RESULTS AND

conclusionFirst, SST are limited in their measurement capabilities. Second, SST have an impact on human agency and autonomy. This concerns both the patient and the caregiver. Third, some aspects of the Total Care principle are likely to be marginalized due to the use of SST. The paper formulates normative requirements for using SST to serve human flourishing. It unfolds three criteria according to which SST must be aligned: (1) evidence and purposefulness, (2) autonomy, and (3) Total Care.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingPalliative CareArtificial IntelligenceDelivery of Health CareHumansTechnologyArtificial IntelligenceEthicsQuality of lifeSmart Sensor TechnologiesTotal Care

Identifiers

PMID37101258
PMCPMC10131446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.