Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101244›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2023

Rapid ethnography and participatory techniques increase onchocerciasis mass drug administration treatment coverage in Benin: a difference-in-differences analysis.

Arianna Rubin Means, N'koué Emmanuel Sambiéni, Euripide Avokpaho, Abdoulaye Benon Monra, Fifamè Aubierge Eudoxie Kpatinvoh, Kevin Bardosh, Moudachirou Ibikounlé

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Arianna Rubin MeansDepartment of Global Health, Hans Rosling Center Box 351620, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. aerubin@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4087-7080
N'koué Emmanuel SambiéniDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Parakou, 03BP107, Parakou, Benin.
Euripide AvokpahoInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Benin, Abomey-Calavi, Benin.
Abdoulaye Benon MonraInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Benin, Abomey-Calavi, Benin.
Fifamè Aubierge Eudoxie KpatinvohInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Benin, Abomey-Calavi, Benin.
Kevin BardoshSchool of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Moudachirou IbikounléInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Benin, Abomey-Calavi, Benin.
Sankt Hans Hospital · DKUniversité d'Abomey-Calavi · BJUniversité de Parakou · BJUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Task Force for Global Health 198D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnchocerciasis, a neglected tropical disease (NTD) that causes blindness, is controlled via mass drug administration (MDA) where entire endemic communities are targeted with preventative chemotherapeutic treatment. However, in many settings, MDA coverage remains low. The purpose of this project was to determine if engaging communities in the development of implementation strategies improves MDA coverage.

methodsThis study took place in an intervention and a control commune in Benin, West Africa. We conducted rapid ethnography in each commune to learn about community member perceptions of onchocerciasis, MDA, and opportunities to increase MDA coverage. Findings were shared with key stakeholders and a structured nominal group technique was used to derive implementation strategies most likely to increase treatment coverage. The implementation strategies were delivered prior to and during onchocerciasis MDA. We conducted a coverage survey within 2 weeks of MDA to determine treatment coverage in each commune. A difference-in-differences design was used to determine if the implementation package effectively increased coverage. A dissemination meeting was held with the NTD program and partners to share findings and determine the perceived acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of implementing rapid ethnography as part of routine program improvement.

resultsDuring rapid ethnography, key barriers to MDA participation included trust in community drug distributors, poor penetration of MDA programs in rural or geographically isolated areas, and low demand for MDA among specific sub-populations driven by religious or socio-cultural beliefs. Stakeholders developed a five-component implementation strategy package, including making drug distributor trainings dynamic, redesigning distributor job aids, tailoring community sensitization messages, formalizing supervision, and preparing local champions. After implementing the strategy package, MDA coverage increased by 13% (95% CI: 11.0-15.9%) in the intervention commune relative to the control commune. Ministry of Health and implementing partners found the approach to be largely acceptable and appropriate; however, there was mixed feedback regarding the feasibility of future implementation of rapid ethnography.

conclusionsImplementation research conducted in Benin, and indeed throughout sub-Saharan Africa, is often implemented in a top-down manner, with both implementation determinants and strategies derived in the global North. This project demonstrates the importance of participatory action research involving community members and implementers to optimize program delivery.

Indexed as

BeninMass drug administrationNeglected tropical diseasesParticipatory action researchRapid ethnography

Identifiers

PMID37101244
PMCPMC10132427
OpenAlexW4367174658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.