Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101200›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2023

Extending inherited metabolic disorder diagnostics with biomarker interaction visualizations.

Denise N Slenter, Irene M G M Hemel, Chris T Evelo, Jörgen Bierau, Egon L Willighagen, Laura K M Steinbusch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Denise N SlenterDepartment of Bioinformatics (BiGCaT), NUTRIM, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. denise.slenter@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-8449-1318
Irene M G M HemelDepartment of Bioinformatics (BiGCaT), NUTRIM, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Chris T EveloDepartment of Bioinformatics (BiGCaT), NUTRIM, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jörgen BierauDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Egon L WillighagenDepartment of Bioinformatics (BiGCaT), NUTRIM, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Laura K M SteinbuschDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInherited Metabolic Disorders (IMDs) are rare diseases where one impaired protein leads to a cascade of changes in the adjacent chemical conversions. IMDs often present with non-specific symptoms, a lack of a clear genotype-phenotype correlation, and de novo mutations, complicating diagnosis. Furthermore, products of one metabolic conversion can be the substrate of another pathway obscuring biomarker identification and causing overlapping biomarkers for different disorders. Visualization of the connections between metabolic biomarkers and the enzymes involved might aid in the diagnostic process. The goal of this study was to provide a proof-of-concept framework for integrating knowledge of metabolic interactions with real-life patient data before scaling up this approach. This framework was tested on two groups of well-studied and related metabolic pathways (the urea cycle and pyrimidine de-novo synthesis). The lessons learned from our approach will help to scale up the framework and support the diagnosis of other less-understood IMDs.

methodsOur framework integrates literature and expert knowledge into machine-readable pathway models, including relevant urine biomarkers and their interactions. The clinical data of 16 previously diagnosed patients with various pyrimidine and urea cycle disorders were visualized on the top 3 relevant pathways. Two expert laboratory scientists evaluated the resulting visualizations to derive a diagnosis.

resultsThe proof-of-concept platform resulted in varying numbers of relevant biomarkers (five to 48), pathways, and pathway interactions for each patient. The two experts reached the same conclusions for all samples with our proposed framework as with the current metabolic diagnostic pipeline. For nine patient samples, the diagnosis was made without knowledge about clinical symptoms or sex. For the remaining seven cases, four interpretations pointed in the direction of a subset of disorders, while three cases were found to be undiagnosable with the available data. Diagnosing these patients would require additional testing besides biochemical analysis.

conclusionThe presented framework shows how metabolic interaction knowledge can be integrated with clinical data in one visualization, which can be relevant for future analysis of difficult patient cases and untargeted metabolomics data. Several challenges were identified during the development of this framework, which should be resolved before this approach can be scaled up and implemented to support the diagnosis of other (less understood) IMDs. The framework could be extended with other OMICS data (e.g. genomics, transcriptomics), and phenotypic data, as well as linked to other knowledge captured as Linked Open Data.

Indexed as

Metabolic DiseasesBiomarkersGenomicsHumansMetabolomicsPyrimidinesBiomarkersPyrimidinesClinical metabolic biomarkersNetwork data analysisPurine and pyrimidine metabolismSemantic web technologiesSystems biologyUrea cycle

Identifiers

PMID37101200
PMCPMC10131334
OpenAlexW4367052074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.