Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101181›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

From design to action: participatory approach to capacity building needs for local overdose response plans.

Maryam Mallakin, Christina Dery, Yordanos Woldemariam, Michael Hamilton, Kim Corace, Bernie Pauly, Triti Khorasheh, Caroline Bennett AbuAyyash, Pamela Leece, Katherine Sellen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maryam MallakinHealth Design Studio, OCAD University, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W1, Canada.
Christina DeryHealth Design Studio, OCAD University, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W1, Canada.
Yordanos WoldemariamHealth Design Studio, OCAD University, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W1, Canada.
Michael HamiltonInstitute for Safe Medication Practices Canada (ISMP Canada), Toronto, ON, M2N6K8, Canada.
Kim CoraceRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Center, Ottawa, ON, K1Z7K4, Canada.
Bernie PaulyUniversity of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8P5C2, Canada.
Triti KhorashehHealth Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, M5G1V2, Canada.
Caroline Bennett AbuAyyashHealth Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, M5G1V2, Canada.
Pamela LeeceHealth Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, M5G1V2, Canada.
Katherine SellenHealth Design Studio, OCAD University, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W1, Canada. ksellen@faculty.ocadu.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to the rise in opioid-related deaths, communities across Ontario have developed opioid or overdose response plans to address issues at the local level. Public Health Ontario (PHO) leads the Community Opioid / Overdose Capacity Building (COM-CAP) project, which aims to reduce overdose-related harms at the community level by working with communities to identify, develop, and evaluate capacity building supports for local needs around overdose planning. The 'From Design to Action' co-design workshop used a participatory design approach to engage communities in identifying the requirements for capacity building support.

methodsA participatory approach (co-design) provided opportunity for collaborative discussion around capacity building needs at the community level. The co-design workshop included three structured collaborative activities to 1) prioritize scenarios that illustrated various challenges associated with community overdose response planning, 2) prioritize the challenges within each scenario and 3) prioritize the supports to address each of these challenges. It was conducted with fifty-two participants involved in opioid/overdose-related response plans in Ontario. Participatory materials were informed by the results of a situational assessment (SA) data gathering process, including survey, interview, and focus group data. A voting system, including dot stickers and discussion notes, was applied to identify priority supports and delivery mechanisms.

resultsAt the workshop, key challenges and top-priority supports were identified, for development and implementation. The prioritized challenges were organized into five categories of capacity building supports addressing: 1) stigma & equity; 2) trust-based relationships, consensus building & on-going communication; 3) knowledge development & on-going access to information and data; 4) tailored strategies and plan adaptation to changing structures and local context; and 5) structural enablers and responsive governance.

conclusionUsing a participatory approach, the workshop provided an opportunity for sharing, generating, and mobilizing knowledge to address research-practice gaps at the community level for opioid response planning. The application of health design methods such as the 'From Design to Action' co-design workshop supports teams to gain a deeper understanding of needs for capacity building as well as illustrating the application of participatory approaches in identifying capacity building needs for complex public health issues such as the overdose crisis.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingDrug OverdoseAnalgesics, OpioidFocus GroupsHumansOntarioAnalgesics, OpioidCapacity-buildingCo-design workshopOpioid crisisOverdoseParticipatory designPublic health

Identifiers

PMID37101181
PMCPMC10132919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.