Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101176›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

An early detection and segmentation of Brain Tumor using Deep Neural Network.

Mukul Aggarwal, Amod Kumar Tiwari, M Partha Sarathi, Anchit Bijalwan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mukul AggarwalDr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Amod Kumar TiwariRajkiya Engineering College, Sonbhadra, Uttar Pradesh, India.
M Partha SarathiAmity School of Engineering and Technology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anchit BijalwanFaculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia. anchit.bijalwan@amu.edu.et.
Amity University · INArba Minch University · ETDr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic resonance image (MRI) brain tumor segmentation is crucial and important in the medical field, which can help in diagnosis and prognosis, overall growth predictions, Tumor density measures, and care plans needed for patients. The difficulty in segmenting brain Tumors is primarily because of the wide range of structures, shapes, frequency, position, and visual appeal of Tumors, like intensity, contrast, and visual variation. With recent advancements in Deep Neural Networks (DNN) for image classification tasks, intelligent medical image segmentation is an exciting direction for Brain Tumor research. DNN requires a lot of time & processing capabilities to train because of only some gradient diffusion difficulty and its complication.

methodsTo overcome the gradient issue of DNN, this research work provides an efficient method for brain Tumor segmentation based on the Improved Residual Network (ResNet). Existing ResNet can be improved by maintaining the details of all the available connection links or by improving projection shortcuts. These details are fed to later phases, due to which improved ResNet achieves higher precision and can speed up the learning process.

resultsThe proposed improved Resnet address all three main components of existing ResNet: the flow of information through the network layers, the residual building block, and the projection shortcut. This approach minimizes computational costs and speeds up the process.

conclusionAn experimental analysis of the BRATS 2020 MRI sample data reveals that the proposed methodology achieves competitive performance over the traditional methods like CNN and Fully Convolution Neural Network (FCN) in more than 10% improved accuracy, recall, and f-measure.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedEarly DiagnosisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerBrain tumorCNNDeep neural networkHealthcarePrediction modelsResNetSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID37101176
PMCPMC10134539
OpenAlexW4367050267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.