Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101100›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

A field test of computer-vision-based gaze estimation in psychology.

Niilo V Valtakari, Roy S Hessels, Diederick C Niehorster, Charlotte Viktorsson, Pär Nyström, Terje Falck-Ytter, Chantal Kemner, Ignace T C Hooge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Automated Infant Eye Tracking: A Systematic Historical Review.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. GazeCapsNet: A Lightweight Gaze Estimation Framework.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Model-Based 3D Gaze Estimation Using a TOF Camera.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Niilo V ValtakariExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands. niilovaltakari@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2813-4839
Roy S HesselsExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Diederick C NiehorsterLund University Humanities Lab, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Charlotte ViktorssonDevelopment and Neurodiversity Lab, Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Pär NyströmUppsala Child and Baby Lab, Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Terje Falck-YtterDevelopment and Neurodiversity Lab, Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Chantal KemnerExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Ignace T C HoogeExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-vision-based gaze estimation refers to techniques that estimate gaze direction directly from video recordings of the eyes or face without the need for an eye tracker. Although many such methods exist, their validation is often found in the technical literature (e.g., computer science conference papers). We aimed to (1) identify which computer-vision-based gaze estimation methods are usable by the average researcher in fields such as psychology or education, and (2) evaluate these methods. We searched for methods that do not require calibration and have clear documentation. Two toolkits, OpenFace and OpenGaze, were found to fulfill these criteria. First, we present an experiment where adult participants fixated on nine stimulus points on a computer screen. We filmed their face with a camera and processed the recorded videos with OpenFace and OpenGaze. We conclude that OpenGaze is accurate and precise enough to be used in screen-based experiments with stimuli separated by at least 11 degrees of gaze angle. OpenFace was not sufficiently accurate for such situations but can potentially be used in sparser environments. We then examined whether OpenFace could be used with horizontally separated stimuli in a sparse environment with infant participants. We compared dwell measures based on OpenFace estimates to the same measures based on manual coding. We conclude that OpenFace gaze estimates may potentially be used with measures such as relative total dwell time to sparse, horizontally separated areas of interest, but should not be used to draw conclusions about measures such as dwell duration.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsVision, OcularAdultCalibrationEyeHumansVideo RecordingComputer visionData qualityEye trackingGaze estimation

Identifiers

PMID37101100
PMCPMC10990994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.