Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101058›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2023

Fracture Toughness: Bridging the Gap Between Hip Fracture and Fracture Risk Assessment.

Daniel Dapaah, Daniel R Martel, Faezeh Iranmanesh, Corin Seelemann, Andrew C Laing, Thomas Willett

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel DapaahDepartment of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Daniel R MartelDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Faezeh IranmaneshDepartment of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Corin SeelemannDepartment of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Andrew C LaingDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Thomas WillettDepartment of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada. thomas.willett@uwaterloo.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6220-4557
University of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review surveys recent literature related to cortical bone fracture mechanics and its application towards understanding bone fragility and hip fractures. RECENT

findingsCurrent clinical tools for hip fracture risk assessment have been shown to be insensitive in some cases of elevated fracture risk leading to the question of what other factors account for fracture risk. The emergence of cortical bone fracture mechanics has thrown light on other factors at the tissue level that are important to bone fracture resistance and therefore assessment of fracture risk. Recent cortical bone fracture toughness studies have shown contributions from the microstructure and composition towards cortical bone fracture resistance. A key component currently overlooked in the clinical evaluation of fracture risk is the importance of the organic phase and water to irreversible deformation mechanisms that enhance the fracture resistance of cortical bone. Despite recent findings, there is an incomplete understanding of which mechanisms lead to the diminished contribution of the organic phase and water to the fracture toughness in aging and bone-degrading diseases. Notably, studies of the fracture resistance of cortical bone from the hip (specifically the femoral neck) are few, and those that exist are mostly consistent with studies of bone tissue from the femoral diaphysis. Cortical bone fracture mechanics highlights that there are multiple determinants of bone quality and therefore fracture risk and its assessment. There is still much more to learn concerning the tissue-level mechanisms of bone fragility. An improved understanding of these mechanisms will allow for the development of better diagnostic tools and therapeutic measures for bone fragility and fracture.

Indexed as

Bone DiseasesHip FracturesBone DensityFemur NeckHumansRisk AssessmentWaterWaterBone qualityCortical boneFemoral neckFracture riskFracture toughnessFragility

Identifiers

PMID37101058
OpenAlexW4367175184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.