ArticleScientific reports2023
Automatic evaluation-feedback system for automated social skills training.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Embedding virtual reality social skills training into return-to-work care for depression: A single-arm feasibility pilot with exploratory autistic-trait moderation.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
- Analysis of Social Performance and Action Units During Social Skills Training: Focus Group Study of Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Schizophrenia.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social skills training (SST), which is a rehabilitation program for improving daily interpersonal communication, has been used for more than 40 years. Although such training's demand is increasing, its accessibility is limited due to the lack of experienced trainers. To tackle this issue, automated SST systems have been studied for years. An evaluation-feedback pipeline of social skills is a crucial component of an SST system. Unfortunately, research that considers both the evaluation and feedback parts of automation remains insufficient. In this paper, we collected and analyzed the characteristics of a human-human SST dataset that consisted of 19 healthy controls, 15 schizophreniacs, 16 autism spectrum disorder (ASD) participants, and 276 sessions with score labels of six clinical measures. From our analysis of this dataset, we developed an automated SST evaluation-feedback system under the supervision of professional, experienced SST trainers. We identified their preferred or most acceptable feedback methods by running a user-study on the following conditions: with/without recorded video of the role-plays of users and different amounts of positive and corrective feedback. We confirmed a reasonable performance of our social-skill-score estimation models as our system's evaluation part with a maximum Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.68. For the feedback part, our user-study concluded that people understood more about what aspects they need to improve by watching recorded videos of their own performance. In terms of the amount of feedback, participants most preferred a 2-positive/1-corrective format. Since the average amount of feedback preferred by the participants nearly equaled that from experienced trainers in human-human SSTs, our result suggests the practical future possibilities of an automated evaluation-feedback system that complements SSTs done by professional trainers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.