Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37100874›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2023

Evaluation of DNA methylation biomarkers ASCL1 and LHX8 on HPV-positive self-collected samples from primary HPV-based screening.

Lisanne Verhoef, Maaike C G Bleeker, Nicole Polman, Renske D M Steenbergen, Renée M F Ebisch, Willem J G Melchers, Ruud L M Bekkers, Anco C Molijn, Wim G Quint, Folkert van Kemenade and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisanne VerhoefAmsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9877-0297
Maaike C G BleekerAmsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicole PolmanAmsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Renske D M SteenbergenAmsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Renée M F EbischRadboud University Medical Center, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Willem J G MelchersRadboud University Medical Center, Medical Microbiology, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Ruud L M BekkersGROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4577-8495
Anco C MolijnEurofins NMDL-LCPL, 2280 CA, Rijswijk, the Netherlands.
Wim G QuintEurofins NMDL-LCPL, 2280 CA, Rijswijk, the Netherlands.
Folkert van KemenadeErasmus MC University Medical Center, Pathology, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Chris J L M MeijerAmsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2758-9463
Johannes BerkhofAmsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniëlle A M HeidemanAmsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. dam.heideman@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6463-7391
Dutch Cancer Society · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLEurofins (Netherlands) · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHost-cell DNA methylation analysis can be used to triage women with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive self-collected cervicovaginal samples, but current data are restricted to under-/never-screened women and referral populations. This study evaluated triage performance in women who were offered primary HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening.

methodsSelf-collected samples from 593 HPV-positive women who participated in a primary HPV self-sampling trial (IMPROVE study; NTR5078), were tested for the DNA methylation markers ASCL1 and LHX8 using quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR (qMSP). The diagnostic performance for CIN3 and cervical cancer (CIN3 + ) was evaluated and compared with that of paired HPV-positive clinician-collected cervical samples.

resultsSignificantly higher methylation levels were found in HPV-positive self-collected samples of women with CIN3 + than control women with no evidence of disease (P values <0.0001). The marker panel ASCL1/LHX8 yielded a sensitivity for CIN3 + detection of 73.3% (63/86; 95% CI 63.9-82.6%), with a corresponding specificity of 61.1% (310/507; 95% CI 56.9-65.4%). The relative sensitivity for detecting CIN3+ was 0.95 (95% CI 0.82-1.10) for self-collection versus clinician-collection, and the relative specificity was 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.90).

conclusionsThe ASCL1/LHX8 methylation marker panel constitutes a feasible direct triage method for the detection of CIN3 + in HPV-positive women participating in routine screening by self-sampling.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBiomarkersDNA MethylationEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansASCL1 protein, humanBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID37100874
PMCPMC10132796
OpenAlexW4367059992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.