Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37100816›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

High spontaneous integration rates of end-modified linear DNAs upon mammalian cell transfection.

Samuel Lim, R Rogers Yocum, Pamela A Silver, Jeffrey C Way

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel LimDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. samuel_lim@hms.harvard.edu.
R Rogers YocumGeneral Biologics, Inc, 108 Fayerweather Street, Unit 2, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
Pamela A SilverDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Jeffrey C WayGeneral Biologics, Inc, 108 Fayerweather Street, Unit 2, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA. jeff.way@genbiologics.com.
Center for Systems Biology · USHarvard University · USUS Biologic (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In gene therapy, potential integration of therapeutic transgene into host cell genomes is a serious risk that can lead to insertional mutagenesis and tumorigenesis. Viral vectors are often used as the gene delivery vehicle, but they are prone to undergoing integration events. More recently, non-viral delivery of linear DNAs having modified geometry such as closed-end linear duplex DNA (CELiD) have shown promise as an alternative, due to prolonged transgene expression and less cytotoxicity. However, whether modified-end linear DNAs can also provide a safe, non-integrating gene transfer remains unanswered. Herein, we compare the genomic integration frequency upon transfection of cells with expression vectors in the forms of circular plasmid, unmodified linear DNA, CELiDs with thioester loops, and Streptavidin-conjugated blocked-end linear DNA. All of the forms of linear DNA resulted in a high fraction of the cells being stably transfected-between 10 and 20% of the initially transfected cells. These results indicate that blocking the ends of linear DNA is insufficient to prevent integration.

Indexed as

DNAGenetic VectorsAnimalsMammalsPlasmidsTransfectionTransgenesDNA

Identifiers

PMID37100816
PMCPMC10133325
OpenAlexW4367050916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.