Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37100054›Full record

ArticleNeuron2023

Integrating model development across computational neuroscience, cognitive science, and machine learning.

Padraig Gleeson, Sharon Crook, David Turner, Katherine Mantel, Mayank Raunak, Ted Willke, Jonathan D Cohen

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Automating the practice of science: Opportunities, challenges, and implications.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Padraig GleesonDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: p.gleeson@ucl.ac.uk.
Sharon CrookSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
David TurnerPrinceton Institute for Computational Science & Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Katherine MantelPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Mayank RaunakIntel Labs, Intel Corp, Hillsboro, OR, USA.
Ted WillkeIntel Labs, Intel Corp, Hillsboro, OR, USA.
Jonathan D CohenPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. Electronic address: jdc@princeton.edu.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroscience, cognitive science, and computer science are increasingly benefiting through their interactions. This could be accelerated by direct sharing of computational models across disparate modeling software used in each. We describe a Model Description Format designed to meet this challenge.

Indexed as

Cognitive NeuroscienceNeurosciencesMachine LearningSoftware

Identifiers

PMID37100054
PMCPMC7616330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.