Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37099937›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics2023

Chronic effects of pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound aided delivery of gemcitabine in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer.

Tatiana D Khokhlova, Yak-Nam Wang, Helena Son, Stephanie Totten, Stella Whang, Joo Ha Hwang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Histotripsy: A Method for Mechanical Tissue Ablation with Ultrasound.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tatiana D KhokhlovaDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Electronic address: tdk7@uw.edu.
Yak-Nam WangApplied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Helena SonDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Stephanie TottenApplied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Stella WhangDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Joo Ha HwangDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.
University of Washington · USUniversity of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory · USStanford University · US

Funding

Ultrasound enhanced penetration for treatment of pancreatic cancerR01CA154451 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HWANG, JOO HA · 2011 to 2021
$4.3M
Pulsed Focused Ultrasound (pFUS) exposures and devices for tissue permeabilization without contrast agentsR01EB023910 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KHOKHLOVA, TATIANA · 2017 to 2021
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154451NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound (pHIFU) is a non-invasive method that allows to permeabilize pancreatic tumors through inertial cavitation and thereby increase the concentration of systemically administered drug. In this study the tolerability of weekly pHIFU-aided administrations of gemcitabine (gem) and their influence on tumor progression and immune microenvironment were investigated in genetically engineered KrasLSL.G12D/þ; p53R172H/þ; PdxCretg/þ (KPC) mouse model of spontaneously occurring pancreatic tumors. KPC mice were enrolled in the study when the tumor size reached 4-6 mm and treated once a week with either ultrasound-guided pHIFU (1.5 MHz transducer, 1 ms pulses, 1% duty cycle, peak negative pressure 16.5 MPa) followed by administration of gem (n = 9), gem only (n = 5) or no treatment (n = 8). Tumor progression was followed by ultrasound imaging until the study endpoint (tumor size reaching 1 cm), whereupon the excised tumors were analyzed by histology, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and gene expression profiling (Nanostring PanCancer Immune Profiling panel). The pHIFU + gem treatments were well tolerated; the pHIFU-treated region of the tumor turned hypoechoic immediately following treatment in all mice, and this effect persisted throughout the observation period (2-5 weeks) and corresponded to areas of cell death, according to histology and IHC. Enhanced labeling by Granzyme-B was observed within and adjacent to the pHIFU treated area, but not in the non-treated tumor tissue; no difference in CD8 + staining was observed between the treatment groups. Gene expression analysis showed that the pHIFU + gem combination treatment lead to significant downregulation of 162 genes related to immunosuppression, tumorigenesis, and chemoresistance vs gem only treatment.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationPancreatic NeoplasmsAnimalsCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalGemcitabineMiceTumor MicroenvironmentGemcitabineCavitationDrug deliveryPancreatic cancerpulsed HIFUTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID37099937
PMCPMC10225358
OpenAlexW4366572545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.