Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37099744›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2023

Are the Relevant Risk Factors Being Adequately Captured in Empirical Studies of Smoking Initiation? A Machine Learning Analysis Based on the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study.

Thuy T T Le, Mona Issabakhsh, Yameng Li, Luz María Sánchez-Romero, Jiale Tan, Rafael Meza, David Levy, David Mendez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identifying Key Predictors of Smoking Cessation Success: Text-Based Feature Selection Using a Large Language Model.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thuy T T LeDepartment of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3106-4045
Mona IssabakhshDepartment of Oncology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Yameng LiDepartment of Oncology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5851-8652
Luz María Sánchez-RomeroDepartment of Oncology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7951-3965
Jiale TanDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Rafael MezaIntegrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver BC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1076-5037
David LevyDepartment of Oncology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5280-3612
David MendezDepartment of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4415-4832

Funding

Research Project 3: Modeling the Impact of Tobacco Control Policies on Polytobacco Use and Associated Health DisparitiesU54CA229974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI David Mendez Emilien · 2018 to 2026
$39.2M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA229974NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCigarette smoking continues to pose a threat to public health. Identifying individual risk factors for smoking initiation is essential to further mitigate this epidemic. To the best of our knowledge, no study today has used machine learning (ML) techniques to automatically uncover informative predictors of smoking onset among adults using the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study. AIMS AND

methodsIn this work, we employed random forest paired with Recursive Feature Elimination to identify relevant PATH variables that predict smoking initiation among adults who have never smoked at baseline between two consecutive PATH waves. We included all potentially informative baseline variables in wave 1 (wave 4) to predict past 30-day smoking status in wave 2 (wave 5). Using the first and most recent pairs of PATH waves was found sufficient to identify the key risk factors of smoking initiation and test their robustness over time. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting method was employed to test the quality of these selected variables.

resultsAs a result, classification models suggested about 60 informative PATH variables among many candidate variables in each baseline wave. With these selected predictors, the resulting models have a high discriminatory power with the area under the specificity-sensitivity curves of around 80%. We examined the chosen variables and discovered important features. Across the considered waves, two factors, (1) BMI, and (2) dental and oral health status, robustly appeared as important predictors of smoking initiation, besides other well-established predictors.

conclusionsOur work demonstrates that ML methods are useful to predict smoking initiation with high accuracy, identifying novel smoking initiation predictors, and to enhance our understanding of tobacco use behaviors. IMPLICATIONS: Understanding individual risk factors for smoking initiation is essential to prevent smoking initiation. With this methodology, a set of the most informative predictors of smoking onset in the PATH data were identified. Besides reconfirming well-known risk factors, the findings suggested additional predictors of smoking initiation that have been overlooked in previous work. More studies that focus on the newly discovered factors (BMI and dental and oral health status,) are needed to confirm their predictive power against the onset of smoking as well as determine the underlying mechanisms.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsAdultHumansLongitudinal StudiesRisk FactorsTobacco Use

Identifiers

PMID37099744
PMCPMC10347975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.